by Mike Robinson
The
difficulty most Christians have about arguments for the existence of God is
that they think it is a complex task that requires detailed analysis. Most
Christians think it is an issue that people can disagree with, but I’d like you
to go home to night and understand that the conclusion that God exists is so
obvious that men are without excuse when they don’t believe it. Paul says that
all men know God and suppress the truth. It is just because unbelievers are
depending upon God and the existence of God is so obvious, that they are made
fools when they try to suppress it (Greg Bahnsen).
No
atheist or agnostic really lives consistently with his worldview. In some way
he affirms meaning, value, or purpose without an adequate basis. It is our job
to discover those areas and lovingly show him where those beliefs are
groundless.gs (William Lane Craig).
The atheist can't find God for the same reason
that a thief can't find a policeman (C.S. Lewis).
The worst moment for the atheist is when he is
really thankful, and has nobody to thank (Dante Rossetti).
The first century Church was in crisis at the very beginning. The
Roman governor Pontius Pilate had ordered the execution of Jesus Christ, and
many apostles had run away and hid from the authorities. Priests had turned
Christ over to the pagan procurator and successfully urged him to crucify
Christ. Evangelists and teachers had surrendered their ministry to be derided
and disallowed in the city streets as well as anywhere near the temple. An air
of distress and fear hung over the church. Some might have thought that God was
dead.
But something powerful, even colossal, arose to restore the
confidence and buoyancy of the New Testament congregation: the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The task of the church, in the Christ’s vision, was to preach the
good news of redemption to a fallen world as it seeks to make disciples
(Matthew 28:19-20). Jesus sought to purge sin from His people’s record and
reduce the amount of wickedness in every corner of the globe through the
expanse of the church.
After Christ’s resurrection appearances, the church believed that,
in all lands, the first job was to preach the gospel (the death and
resurrection of Christ: 1 Corinthians 15:1-4) and then defend the faith (1
Peter 3:15). Yes, it’s undeniable that Jesus was unlawfully arrested and
sentenced to death. Yes, Jesus died. But on the third day Christ arose and this
truth wouldn't be diluted by fright and anxiety. With this offensive
posture, the apostolic church built a robust ark for all those who came to
Christ. The resurrection changed everything. Clearly, God is not dead!
One of the problems with selected sects and cults, the church
points, is that they are too static. They try to seal off an ark to ride out
the tempest, but they end up shutting themselves in. They cut themselves off
from others and the challenge of truth. In contrast, the church is on the move
because God is alive.
Christ mounted the wings of resurrection power and His followers
run with a risen Savior. Thus, the people of God go on the offense and swallow
the ungodly domain as it transforms it by the word of God. In addition, the
empowering truth of the resurrection is assured and is to always be defended
(Jude 3).
They cannot defeat us.
Christ has died. Christ has risen. We are alive in him. And in him there is no
condemnation. We are forgiven.[1]
Often, the Bible uses evidential arguments. For example, when
scripture states in Psalm 19 that the heavens declare the glory of God, it is
denoting how God’s glory is manifested in the natural world. It is proven by
nature itself. Evidence and proof are everywhere around us. If you offer an
evidential assertion, you should have real evidence to posit such.
Equally, there is no amount of evidence that is adequate in and of
itself to persuade a non-believer of the truth of Jesus Christ. Prayer must be
undertaken and the gospel must be presented, but God’s grace is the ultimate
means for salvation of a soul.
At night, atheists find themselves looking out at the starry hosts
spangled against the dark canvass of the night and declare that it was all just
an accident. They do not see design where design clearly resides. The
mathematical precision necessary for the running of the planets to and fro was
not designed. All the precision came from chaos and blind chance. They have
blind faith in scientism as they suppress the truth in unrighteousness. In
actuality, they know that God designed the cosmos, but they do not want to
believe it.
Logically, there cannot be any true atheists. For one to propose
that God does not exist, anywhere at any time, one would have to know all
things, and be omnipresent, eternal, and infinite. That would make you God.
So, the only person in the universe who could possibly not believe
in God, everywhere, and always, would be God. One would have to be God to be a
true atheist and that is theoretically, logically, and rationally absurd.*
No one has enough blind faith to believe that:
- Order came from disorder
- Uniformity came from the accidental
- Intelligence came from non-intelligence
- Design came from chaos
- Personality came from non-personality
- Love came from hard matter
- Something came from nothing
Aggressive Atheists and Skeptics
Richard Dawkins called upon fellow anti-theists to implement crass
mocking as a tactic to use against religious people: “…mock them. Ridicule
them. In public ... religion makes specific claims about the universe which
need to be substantiated, and need to be challenged, and, if necessary, need to
be ridiculed with contempt.”
Ever since I became a Christian in my early twenties, I have
spoken with many hundreds of non-Christians who have told me that I was wrong
to believe in God. The most bitter and rancorous of these rebukes have come
from atheists. This behavior is consistent with men who lack an absolute moral
standard and, therefore, they often sputter out caustic and biting reproofs
against God and Christians. Once they understand that the believer has the
intellectual upper hand, they get very defensive and, frequently, very angry.
No other group with whom I have had dialogues seems to get enraged so often.
These conversations have been at universities, coffeehouses, bookstores, homes,
philosophy groups, and other forums. I ascribe this behavior to human nature
and to the weak intellectual worldview that atheism provides.
Christians may behave rudely and unruly, but when they act this
way they are in opposition to the teachings of Jesus Christ. They are acting in
an inconsistent manner when they engage in troubling behavior. The atheist is
consistent with Darwinian thought when he acts in a hostile and belligerent
fashion.
Objective Moral Values Require a Living God
Moral arguments for God's
existence may be defined as that family of arguments in the history of western
philosophical theology having claims about the character of moral thought and
experience in their premises and affirmations of the existence of God in their
conclusions. Some of these arguments are on all fours with other theistic arguments,
such as the design argument. They cite facts that are claimed to be evident to
human experience. And they argue that such facts entail or are best explained
by the hypothesis that there is a God... Other moral proofs of God's existence
take us away from the patterns of argument typical of natural theology. They
deal in our ends and motives. These variants on the moral argument for God's
existence describe some end that the moral life commits us to (such as the
attainment of the perfect good) and contend that this end cannot be attained
unless God as traditionally defined exists (Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy).
We hope to wake up people
to the double standard. Keith Olbermann can have a position, and even say it on
the air, and he’s OK, but I don’t have a right to biblical beliefs. What we
can’t have in this country is a point where a corporation feels empowered to
punish those who have a biblical belief. That’s the chilling effect of this
moment in my life (sportscaster Craig James after Fox Sports fired him for
holding biblical beliefs).
Our means of discerning what is good and right is found in the
Bible. It is our authority and guide. Mankind is not the standard. Science
cannot be the standard. The Bible alone provides a standard based on an
all-knowing and unchanging God. The standard must be based on an unchanging
source, otherwise ethics could change. If moral standards were changeable, this
would mean that theft and murder may be considered bad on one day and good the
next. This is manifestly wrong and is one more reason we must follow God’s
word.
Humanism
or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are big, strong,
and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch out if you are in a
lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or smarter (William
Murray).
The Death and Resurrection of Christ: God Exists
Today, I would say the
claim concerning the resurrection is more impressive than any by the religious
competition (former atheist Anthony Flew).
It’s worth noting that the apostles saw the risen Christ, touched
the risen Christ, and died tortuous deaths while proclaiming the truth of the
resurrection. They did this when all they had to do was deny it to avoid
persecution and death. Sure, many people die for lies, but no collective,
diverse group of people die for a lie when they have sure knowledge that
it is a lie. Furthermore, all known ancient documents that refer to the subject
report an empty tomb. Even though the manner in which one accepts or rejects
the evidence is controlled by one’s presuppositions, the facts are mighty. The
evidence is there and it is impressive.
Evidence is Delightful
The Christian worldview alone offers a confirmed resurrection of a
Savior to demonstrate its authority. The Greek deities and other
pseudo-resurrected gods were not historical figures. The only documents we have
concerning the false gods/myths are the specific documents dated hundreds of
years after Christianity arose.
Evidence is indeed wonderful. The Christian faith has an abundance
of evidence to support its claims. In truth, there is nothing but evidence
for the God of the Bible. Every star and every atom declares the majesty of God
(Psalm 19:1).
We see evidence of God’s fingerprints in every known corner of the
universe. Mankind discovers the proof and affirms many of the facts that the
Bible records and announces. The greatest miracle is the resurrection of Jesus.
The Lord Jesus is alive! He is the only religious leader to rise from the dead.
He is the only one who promised a resurrection and duly kept His promise. You
can visit the tombs of all the deceased religious leaders and find their
remains still in the grave. However, Jesus is alive because God is not dead.
All Religious Originators Died and Remained Dead
Dovtastic shares his visit to Mohammad’s grave on
YouTube: “During my trip this year on Hajj I had the great honor to visit our
Prophet Mohammed’s … grave in the Ottoman front portion of the Masjid Al
Nabawi. This beautiful masjid holds one million people in
Medina and when the grave is open for visitation, 1000s of people are passing
through every minute.” This man and millions of others have seen the occupied grave of
Islam’s founder, proving that Mohammad simply remained dead.
You can visit the graves of leaders like Mary Baker Eddy, Joseph
Smith, and Buddha from your home computer by watching a video of their
gravesite on YouTube. They and all the others died and remained dead; their
occupied tombs attest to it. Jesus, however, is alive. His grave is empty. When
people visit His grave it’s vacant.
Jesus said, “All power on earth and heaven has been given to me”
(Matthew 28:18). No force could have kept Him down. The Romans killed Him, put
Him in a cave tomb, and placed huge boulder at a downward angle in front of the
cave. Additionally, the state attached Caesar’s seal on the crypt, and posted
Roman guards to protect the tomb. They were only trying to prevent the
inevitable. Jesus had the power to rise and nobody could stop Him.
God used Christ’s resurrection and His appearances before His
disciples to win many of Christ’s enemies to salvation. The Bible tells us that
“the word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in
Jerusalem; and a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith” (Acts
6:7). Scripture also records that some Pharisees converted to Christianity
(Acts 15:5). It’s clear, God is not dead, He’s the living God.
The Bible is the Word of God
Often skeptics argue that the Bible was written many years after
the events it records, thus it was corrupted over time. Abrasive atheist Sam
Harris notified the world that “the gospels are ancient fiction.” But papyrus
expert Peter Thiede has demonstrated that a copy of the Gospel of Luke, housed
in a French museum, is dated approximately 50 AD.[2] Thiede has also
determined that the Magdalyn Manuscript of the Book of Matthew is dated circa
40-50 AD. And finally, Thiede has dated a copy of the Gospel written by
Mark to be from about 50 AD.[3]
The age of the gospels demonstrates that there was not enough time
between the events and their transcription for the Bible to be tainted or
altered in the manner the critics allege. Ramm acknowledged, “Divine inspiration
of the Bible is the only adequate hypothesis to account for the Bible.”[4]
Predictions Fulfilled: Declaring the Things to Come
Let them bring forth and show us what will happen; let them show
the former things, what they were… Or declare to us things to come. Show the
things that are to come hereafter… Thus says the LORD … I am the First and I am
the Last; besides Me, there is no God. And who can proclaim as I do? … I have
declared the former things from the beginning; … Suddenly I did them, and they
came to pass... Even from the beginning I have declared it to you; before it
came to pass I proclaimed it to you... (Isaiah 41:22-23, 44:6-8, 48:3-20).
Another segment of “proof” for Christianity is the
messianic prophecies that were fulfilled by Jesus Christ. The Old Testament
foretold the coming of the Messiah in precise detail. The text was written
centuries before the coming of Jesus and predicted more than three hundred
prophecies about Him. No other founder of any religion can provide a similar prophetic
record of their life written down centuries before their birth. Joseph Smith,
Ellen G. White, David Berg, Mohammad, and Buddha did not supply a widely
transmitted, pre-existing written record that accurately predicted the specific
details of their lives.
But Saul increased all the
more in strength, and confounded the Jews who dwelt in Damascus, proving that
this Jesus is the Christ (Acts 9:22; italics mine).
The three hundred clear prophecies of the coming Messiah were
predicted and predestined by God (Acts 2:23). The Bible foretold events and
historical details about the coming of Jesus prior to His birth. All these
predictions came true in the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus of
Nazareth. No other spiritual leader or prophet had predictive material written
about their lives recorded before they were born. Jesus Christ had more than
three hundred predictions about His life that were fulfilled in exact detail.
An agent on The X-Files once said: “The best way to predict
the future is to invent it.” And only one with extreme power (God’s omnipotence
qualifies) to perfectly arrange history could create a future where one man
could fulfill hundreds of predictions—most of which were out of a normal man’s
control to arrange.
Then He (Jesus) said to
them, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you,
that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and
the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me” (Luke 24:44).
Christ’s virgin birth was predicted about seven hundred years
before He was born in Isaiah chapter seven verse fourteen: “So the Lord Himself
shall give you a sign. Behold, the virgin will conceive and shall bring forth a
son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel.” His place of birth was recorded in
Micah 5:2, hundreds of years prior to the event: “And you, Bethlehem ... out of
you He shall come forth to Me, to become Ruler in Israel, He whose goings forth
have been ... from eternity.” The exact date of His entry in Jerusalem was
predicted by Daniel in chapter nine. God prophesied the Palm Sunday event
recorded in Zechariah 9:9, “Rejoice greatly … O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold,
your King is coming to you; He is just and having salvation, lowly and riding
on a donkey, a colt, the foal of a donkey.”
Christ’s death on the cross was foretold before that form of
execution had even been invented by Persia. Psalm 22:1-16 announces the
crucifixion hundreds of years before it happened: “My God, my God, why have You
forsaken me... But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised by
the people. All who see me laugh me to scorn; they shoot out the lip; they
shake the head, saying, He trusted on the LORD; let Him deliver him; let Him
rescue him, since He delights in him! I am poured out like water, and all my
bones are spread apart; my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my
bowels and You have brought me into the dust of death. For dogs have circled
around me; the band of spoilers have hemmed me in, they have pierced my hands
and my feet.”
Data is mute; one needs a theoretical framework to make sense of
anything (chemist Roald Hoffman).
This evidence for Christian theism is overwhelming.
Nevertheless, the truth is even more certain and compelling than compiling
great blocks of evidence to prove the reality of Christianity.[1] The argument
for Christian theism is assured. Without God, one cannot provide the
necessary truth conditions for knowledge—including knowledge derived from
evidence and its analysis.
Check out my new book that provides potent proof about the Resurrection Risen HERE
For more see my new book The Reason
God Must Exist: The Assured Argument for God
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE
1.
Rational pre-commitments assist in directing one’s investigation
and analysis of the data (as well as its interpretation and communication).
This admission is often difficult to get from some atheistic inquirers to
acknowledge. What worldview can furnish the a priori necessities and rational
tools for science, analysis and research? Christian theism can deliver the
epistemic ground for the a priori immutable universals utilized in rational
enquiry; in principle, materialistic atheism cannot furnish the aforementioned
ground. What is obligatory to account for scientific analysis is a first
principle that has the ontological endowment to not only ground it, but to
account for it and its preconditions—all the universal operational features of
knowledge. The loss of the immovable point of reference, in principle, leaves
the ungodly bereft of a resource necessary to construct the analytical
enterprise. Without God, one cannot hoist the necessary a priori operation
features of the intellectual examination of evidence. The Christian worldview
supplies the fixed ontic platform as the sufficient truth condition that can
justify induction, immutable universals, attributes, identity, and the
uniformity of the physical world. But materialistic atheism lacks such a fixed
ontic platform. Consequently, it fails to provide the sufficient ground
required to justify enquiry and research. When anyone attempts to escape the
truth that God exists, he falls in a trap he cannot escape. This point is well
made in Van Til’s illustration of a man made of water, who is trying to climb
out of the watery ocean by means of a ladder made of water. He cannot get out
of the water for he has nothing to stand on. Without God, one cannot make sense
of anything. The atheist has nothing to stand on (an ontic Archimedean locus of
reference) and he lacks a rational apparatus to scale an epistemic ladder that
would allow him to view reality with clarity. God and His revealed word supply
men their only possible ground with the explanatory clout needed to account for
critical and analytical pursuits. The ontological barrenness of atheistic
materialism is just one reason the Christian should never grant the natural man
the right to determine the criteria for testing truth claims—atheistic
naturalism lacks an ontology with a shard of explanatory power. Christianity
rests upon God and His Revelation as the ontic Archimedean locus of reference
for science.
First, you admitted a contradiction in your post when you wrote: "Equally, there is no amount of evidence that is adequate in and of itself to persuade a non-believer of the truth of Jesus Christ". Despite this admission, you still went ahead to try provide evidence of the God's existence and the truth of Jesus Christ.
ReplyDeleteI think you did a good job in your post, however, your argument is flawed by relying on the Bible, the truth of which you seek to prove. In other words, you can quote the bible to prove the truth of the bible. The bible is written by delusional people who believed they were chosen by God. Everything else was written in that light.
Beyond that, if God exists, we don't need to rely on an over 2,000 year old book to know. We should know everyday. And speaking of the cosmos as prove of God's existence is ridiculous because christianity never believed in the existence of a cosmos initially. It believed that the earth is all there is, and God sits above it in heaven, and sends the sun during the day and the stars at night. I am sure if in the future a distant planet is found that contains other living organisms, Christians would recant and tell us how God also created those living organisms.
"you can't quote the bible" I meant.
Delete